Apparently, I, or someone like me, doesn't "half talk a load of bollocks" Considering my first language is English, and not gutter Cockney, I'm a bit perplexed by most of the statements made by "animal". However, I would love to have a debate on evolution, natural selection, the food chain, toxins, human "interference" or anything else as long as we use actual logic (the equilibrium argument was stunningly lacking in any higher ordered thinking, as was the cave painting / uncivilized ancestor statement)and refrain from blurting out any interjections that Eliza Doolittle might use. Game, guv'nor?